In 2020, three female high school students – Selina Soule, a senior at Glastonbury High School; Chelsea Mitchell, a senior at Canton High School; and Alanna Smith, a sophomore at Danbury High School – argued against the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference’s 2017 policy revision permitting biological males who identify as females to participate in the women’s division. They argued that the participation of transgender athletes unfairly exposed the girls to injuries.
Smith, one of the other plaintiffs, stressed how the mental and physical challenges they faced due to the “biological unfairness” of allowing transgender athletes to compete with them “don’t go away.”
“All girls deserve the chance to compete on a level playing field,” she said.
The trio, accomplished runners in their own right, claimed that the policy has cost them championship titles, state records and potential scholarship opportunities.
Attorney Christiana Holcomb, representing the athletes through the Alliance Defending Freedom, argued that the policy contradicts Title IX, a federal law designed to create equal opportunities for women in education and athletics. “Connecticut’s policy violates that law and reverses nearly 50 years of advances for women,” Holcomb said.
However, the federal court dismissed the case approximately three years after its initiation in 2020. But on Dec. 18, Appeals Court Judge Alison Nathan reversed the previous ruling, arguing that the plaintiffs had presented a plausible case.
“Plaintiffs plausibly allege that directing defendants to alter public athletic records related to the particularized injury they allege could at least provide plaintiffs with the publicly recognized titles and placements they would have received if Intervenors had not competed and finished ahead of plaintiffs in specific races,” the judge ruled.
Mitchell still seeks to overturn the transgender policy in Connecticut
“I wanted to give voice to my story and help other girls out there so that they wouldn’t have to experience this,” she said. “When colleges looked at me, they didn’t see a winner. They saw a second or third place. I wasn’t a first-place finisher, and I think that’s what really hurt me.”
In their filing with the Second Circuit Appeals Court, the athletes request that the court update their athletic records to reflect the titles and rankings they would have earned had transgender athletes not been competing against them. The filing argues that courts routinely recognize student athletes’ ongoing interest in vindicating the records they have earned.
Mitchell remains optimistic. “We were the first girls to speak out about this issue, but now there are so many more girls speaking out about their own experiences and standing up with us. The more of us there are, the easier it gets,” she said.
Visit GenderConfused.com for more stories about biological males competing in women’s sports.
Four types of cheese have been recalled due to possible E. Coli - with warnings they could have been gifted in Christmas hampers. Mrs Kirkham's Mild and Creamy Lancashire, Mrs Kirkham's Tasty Lancashire, Mrs Kirkham's Mature Lancashire and Mrs Kirkham's Smoked Lancashire have all been recalled as a "precaution". The cheeses might be contaminated with Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, (STEC).Symptoms of an E. coli infection can be similar to flu and […]
Post comments (0)